All the trout fishing literature and advice I’ve come across has always asserted that you should fish for trout by casting upstream and reeling your lure back down keeping it at about the same speed as the current. This advice is for the most part correct being built upon centuries of fishing experience passed down through generations.

The typical reasons given for fishing upstream are that trout feed facing upstream, the lure will go deeper if moving with the current, reeling downstream creates a more realistic presentation of the lure, and if wading your presence may be more apparent to the downstream trout due to scent or the disturbance of the stream. This reasoning is sound, and more often than not this is the approach to be taken for trout fishing streams in general.

Single spinners, such as Mepps and Roostertails, work best for casting across or downstream.

However, I have often found it too tempting to cast my line downstream into a likely spot that I may not have noticed as I waded upstream. I have also found that caving to this temptation is often rewarded with a strike. Here lies my exception to the rule that one should always fish for trout upstream.

In my experience this approach has worked best when I cast across the current, or slightly downstream, at the beginning of a run. I then let the current sweep the lure further downstream and back across into the main current. When successful, the strike usually comes as the lure reaches the end of the sweep, or just as it faces directly upstream with the main current. However, I find it is sometimes necessary to give a couple of quick tugs in order to induce a strike. I’ve done this enough to know that it’s not a freak occurrence, though it may not be as successful as the typical upstream fishing. And, sometimes this approach is the most effective or perhaps the only possible way to reach a particular section of river.

In some circumstances positioning one’s self downstream from a likely spot may spook the trout. There was a particular stream, a tributary to the Deerfield River in the Berkshires of western Massachusetts – Cold Creek – where I used to fish and used this approach quite consistently in a specific stretch. There was a large waterfall flowing into a deep pool, which then gave way to a relatively deep, swift run. The stream was narrow and did not have any type of cover downstream from the run. However, there was a large boulder at the beginning of the run around which the water passed. I found if I approached upstream from the boulder, kept myself concealed, and cast my lure across the current letting it then be swept into the main channel I would get a strike on the first cast nearly every time.

Another benefit to this approach is that you can keep the lure in the trout’s strike zone for a longer period of time. While it may not be efficient to simply let the current hold the lure indefinitely, I have found that if I don’t receive an immediate strike to wait a moment and then give a few quick tugs, which does often incite a trout to strike. This ability to play with the lure in the trout’s feeding lane is not always possible when the current is pushing the lure downstream to you.

Using this approach one can also use the current to deliver the lure to a particularly troublesome, but very trouty, looking piece of cover. Casting upstream may allow you to reel the lure next to a likely eddy or a submerged root wad, but casting downstream and using the current to hold the lure in a likely spot can sometimes be more effective.

Overall, the basic advice that you should fish for trout by casting and wading upstream is correct and this is how I usually proceed. However, if you try giving a cross current or downstream cast a try you’ll probably find it pays off in specific circumstances.